Skip navigation

Category Archives: Humour

Yesterday morning i was checking my personal email for the first time in days; i’ve been busy with work and preparation for a house guest and a severe case of self-inflicted World Cup Football Fever.  So i started opening emails as one does from the most recently arrived and read this:


P…                                                                                           22 Jun 2018, 04:08

to me

Hi Rob,

I insist that you resign from the leadership team of ER-PLN immediately. OUR GROUP IS BASED ON NON-VIOLENCE. Let me know your decision.
to which i replied:

Hi P….,

i’d love to know what you’re being so insistent about.
i’ve been practicing non-violence all my life; i’ve turned the other cheek so often my head spins.
Please advise.
i then opened another email:

H…….                                                          23 Jun 2018, 01:08

to me, C…..

Hi Rob!
I hope this message finds you well!
I wanted to reach out to you personally related to your recent post on the SRIS Facebook page (screenshot attached). There was some concern raised by a member that this post advocated violence and was inappropriate to the mission of sharing ELT resources and advocacy for social justice. We think perhaps the “until 45 is 25ed” was interpreted as if 25ed was a form of violence, i.e. being 86ed or killed.
We value freedom of speech and certainly understand your protest of the current administration and your comment related to boycotting TESOL convention in the U.S. That said, we are also wondering if you might consider editing or removing the comment based on the concern raised above. I know you contribute so much to our community and as community manager, I hope you can understand this request.
I’m here if you’d like to chat more about this;)


to which i replied:
                                                                                          24 Jun 2018, 01:58
to H…, C….


i’m not even an American citizen and i know what the internet meme “until 45 is 25ed” means.
the 45 is, of course Donald J. Drumpf, the 45th President of The United States of America.
the 25 refers to the 25 amendment to the Constitution of said USA which provides the legal background by which a sitting President can be impeached (i.e. the Articles of Impeachment). It was a rather big meme several months ago when it looked like the Russian investigation would lead to more than just a few paltry charges and admissions of guilt by low ranking aides.
pax et amare,
i then followed up with this by way of clarification (in between times i’d watched another footie match):
                                                                                 24 Jun 2018, 04:05
to H…, C….
the actual hashtag was #25for45 (i.e. Impeach Trump)
The next email i opened…

delete your post

to me

Hi Rob,

I need to ask you a serious question: ARE YOU A FUCKING IDIOT?
to which i replied:
                                                                                            24 Jun 2018, 04:23
to H…., P…..

last time i checked i wasn’t as stupid as i look…

Which “FUCKING STUPID NUMBERS” are you referring to?
Having heard from H…. i understand you quite possibly mean “until 45 is 25ed” in a recent post.
that was a variation on the #25for45 twitter hashtag that was quite popular a few months ago when The Donald was being The Donald.
“the 45 is, of course Donald J. Drumpf, the 45th President of The United States of America.
the 25 refers to the 25th amendment to the Constitution of said USA which provides the legal background by which a sitting President can be impeached (i.e. the Articles of Impeachment).”
i was merely stating that until Donny was legally impeached by the US Govt i was going to continue to join the academic boycott of The USA.
(are you American? i’m not but i did learn quickly what #25for45 means.)  The are special places in hades for the likes of @POTUS & @FLOTUS
pax et amare,
To which s/he replied:
                                                                                                24 Jun 2018, 07:12

Hi Rob,

I am sorry I misunderstood your meaning. I am also sorry for the inappropriate emails. Thank you for clearing things up for me.
Hi H….,
Thanks for taking the time to help me out trying to deal with this. I am sorry for the inconvenience. I will definitely try to keep a cool head in the future.
This morning i got this:
                                                                                               24 Jun 2018, 07:12
to me, H….


If you are uncomfortable or unwilling to removing the post, I wonder if—at minimum—you would consider editing your post to make clear the intent (i.e., impeachment/resignation).  I understand through H….  that this is unnecessarily escalating.  (…I am not suggesting that you are the apparent source of the escalation.)

The “About this Group” Facebook page description asks members to “Post comments, teaching ideas, links to teaching materials that promote Social Responsibility in TESOL.”  While—like you—I would welcome the removal or resignation of POTUS, I am not sure the SRIS Facebook page for teaching materials is an appropriate venue for venting.

I hope you receive this email in the respectful tone intended.  Many thanks for considering this request.

Be well,


In response i edited the post:

thank God for artists! (i will continue with my academic boycott of the USA until such time as 45 has been 25ed (45=Trump; 25=25th amendment to US constitution articles of impeachment). So that means i’ve not been to TESOL in since 2016)

and finally i sent this along:

Hi C….. & H…..,

you may have noticed that i did change the post on the SRIS fb page per your suggestion.
Given the recent Supreme Court decisions i’d say y’all have your work cut out for you.  Drumpf now has 5 Justices in his pocket…
One could argue that SRIS’s fb page needs to become a wee bit proactive in advocating for change in the face of what Betsy DeVos, Scott Pruit, Sarah Sanders et al are up to to legitimize 45 and make him appear normal.
Good Luck!
pax et amare,
this just in from P: 


P                                                                                    2 Jul 2018, 20:48
to me

Hi Rob,

About a week has gone by, and I wanted to thank you again for the message explaining things to me. I completely misunderstood your posts and then went about things the wrong way to say the least. I am deeply sorry for messing up. Never have I sent such inappropriate emails and I promise my emails in the future will be better. Just wanted to say, I have been dealing with personal issues recently which have definitely been a factor.
to which i replied: 

Hi P….,

i think i may actually understand where you were coming from (i’m not an authority on American History but an American writer/local man of letters told me:
     “By the way somone could interpret that to assassinating 45. The 25th prez was William McKinley who was killed…
        Numbers are always open to interpretation! I took a course in statistics. One thing I learned you can prove or disprove anything by numbers.  When I first read yr comment I thought that was what you were referring to until you clarified. I was thinking…25th must’ve been assassinated.  Sure enough…so I see where the anger was coming from if that’s what they were thinking you meant…
     Avoid using 20, 25, 35 with 45. Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy…
     Though I have a feeling that could happen. If so I hope its from a family member or someone inside the WH, one of his own who couldnt take the BS anymore…
     Also 16. Lincoln…”
So maybe that’s what you were thinking? i dunno.  Anyhow i hope you get your personal demons sorted out.  we all have to tilt at windmills once in a while.  Sometimes they tilt back but sometimes we win (i just scored a big win from the RC Church: after 13+ years of determined waiting and slow agitation i finally managed to get a Declaration of Nullity so my wife and i can now get married in church and not live in sin anymore…) 😉
take care,
and i leave this with this message from Bansky:



Russell Brand, in an interview with Jeremy Paxman on BBC’s Newsnight, recently called for “a revolultion, a socialist, egalitarian system based on the massive redistribution of wealth“.


The complete accurate transcript.

Jeremy Paxman: “Russell Brand, who are you to edit a political magazine?”

Russell Brand: “Well, I suppose like a person who’s been politely asked by an attractive woman. I don’t know what the typical criteria is. I don’t know many people that edit political magazines. Boris [Johnson]..he used to do one, didn’t he? So I’m a kind of, a person with crazy hair, quite a good sense of humour, don’t know much about politics, I’m ideal.”

Paxman: “But is it true you don’t even vote?”

 “Yeah, no, I don’t vote.”

Paxman: “Well how do you have any authority to talk about politics then?”

Brand: “Well I don’t get my authority from this pre-existing paradigm which is quite narrow and only serves a few people. I look elsewhere, for alternatives, that might be of service to humanity. Alternate means; alternate political systems.”

Paxman: “They being?”

Brand: “Well I’ve not invented it yet, Jeremy. I had to do a magazine last week. I’ve had a lot on me plate. But I say, but here’s the thing that you shouldn’t do. Shouldn’t destroy the planet; shouldn’t create massive economic disparity; shouldn’t ignore the needs of the people. The burden of proof is on the people with the power, not people, like, doing a magazine for a novelty.”

Paxman: “How do you imagine that people get power?”

Brand: “Well I imagine there are sort of hierarchical systems that have been preserved through generations…”

Paxman: “They get power by being voted in, that’s how they get power…”

Brand: “Well you say that Jeremy…”

Paxman: “You can’t even be arsed to vote?”

Brand: “It’s quite a narrow, quite a narrow prescriptive parameter that changes within in the ah…”

 “In a democracy that’s how it works.”

Brand: “Well I don’t think it’s working very well, Jeremy. Given that the planet is being destroyed. Given that there is economic disparity of a huge degree. What are you saying? There’s no alternative? There’s no alternative? Just this system?”

 “No, I’m not saying that. I’m saying if you can’t be arsed to vote why should we be asked to listen to your political point of view?”

Brand: “You don’t have to listen to my political point of view. But it’s not that I’m not voting out of apathy. I’m not voting out of absolute indifference and weariness and exhaustion from the lies, treachery, deceit of the political class, that has been going on for generations now. And which has now reached fever pitch where you have a disenfranchised, disillusioned, despondent underclass that are not being represented by that political system, so voting for it is tacit complicity with that system and that’s not something I’m offering up.”

Paxman: “Well why don’t you change it then?”

Brand: “I’m trying to.”

Paxman: “Well why don’t you start by voting?”

Brand: [Laughs] “I don’t think it works. People have voted already and that’s what’s created the current paradigm.”

Paxman: “When did you last vote?”


Paxman: “You’ve never, ever voted?”

 “No. Do you think that’s really bad?”

Paxman: “So you struck an attitude, what, before the age of 18?”

 “Well I was busy being a drug addict at that point, because I come from the kind of social conditions that are exacerbated by an indifferent system that, really, just administrates for large corporations and ignores the population that it was voted in to serve.”

 “You’re blaming the political class for the fact that you had a drug problem?”

Brand: “No, no, no. I’m saying I was part of a social and economic class that is underserved by the current political system. And drug addiction is one of the problems it creates when you have huge, underserved, impoverished populations, people get drug problems. And, also, don’t feel like they want to engage with the current political system because they see that it doesn’t work for them. They see that it makes no difference. They see that they’re not served. I say that the apathy…”

Paxman: “Of course it doesn’t work for them if they didn’t bother to vote.”

Brand: “Jeremy, my darling, I’m not saying…the apathy doesn’t come from us, the people. The apathy comes from the politicians. They are apathetic to our needs, they’re only interested in servicing the needs of corporations. Look at..ain’t the Tories going to court, taking the EU to court, because they’re trying to curtail bank bonuses? Isn’t that what’s happening at the moment in our country? It is, innit?”


 “So what am I gonna do, tune in for that?”

 “You don’t believe in democracy. You want a revolution don’t you?”

 “The planet is being destroyed, we are creating an underclass, we’re exploiting poor people all over the world and the genuine, legitimate problems of the people are not being addressed by our political class.”

Paxman: “All of those things may be true.”

Brand: “They are true.”

Paxman: “But you took…I wouldn’t argue with you about many of them.”

Brand: “Well how come I feel so cross with you? It can’t just be because of that beard, it’s gorgeous.”

Paxman: “It’s possibly because…”

Brand: “And if the Daily Mail don’t want it, I do. Because I’m against them. Grow it longer. Tangle it into your armpit hair.”

Paxman: “You are a very trivial man.”

Brand: “What you think I am, trivial?”

Paxman: “Yes.”

Brand: “A minute ago you were having a go at me because I wanted a revolution now I’m trivial, I’m bouncing about all over the place.”

Paxman: “I’m not having a go at you because you want a revolution, many people want a revolution, but I’m asking you what it would be like.”

Brand: “Well I think what it won’t be like is a huge disparity between rich and poor where 300 Americans have the same amount of wealth as the 85 million poorest Americans, where there is an exploited and underserved underclass that are being continually ignored, where welfare is slashed while Cameron and Osbourne go to court to defend the rights of bankers to continue receiving their bonuses. That’s all I’m saying.”

Paxman: “What’s the scheme, that’s all I’m asking. What’s the scheme? You talked vaguely about a revolution, what is it?”

Brand: “I think a socialist egalitarian system, based on the massive redistribution of wealth, heavy taxation of corporations and massive responsibility for energy companies and any companies exploiting the environment… I think they should be taxed. I think the very concept of profit should be hugely reduced. David Cameron said profit isn’t a dirty word, I say profit is a filthy word. Because wherever there is profit there is also deficit. And this system currently doesn’t address these ideas. And so why would anyone vote for it? Why would anyone be interested in it?”

Paxman: “Who would levy these taxes?”

 “I think we do need like… I think there needs to be a centralized administrative system but built on…”

Paxman: “A government?”

Brand: “Yes, well, maybe call it something else. Call them like the Admin Bods so they don’t get ahead of themselves.”

Paxman: “And how would they be chosen?”

Brand: “Jeremy, don’t ask me to sit here in an interview with you, in a bloody hotel room and devise a global, utopian system. I’m merely pointing out that the current…”

Paxman: “You’re calling for revolution!”

Brand: “Yeah, absolutely. I’m calling for change. I’m calling for genuine alternatives.”

 “There are many people who would agree with you..”

Brand: “Good.”

Paxman: “The current system is not engaging with all sorts of problems, yes. And they feel apathetic, really apathetic. But if they were to take you seriously, and not to vote…”

Brand: “Yeah, they shouldn’t vote, they should, that’s one thing they should do, don’t bother voting. Because when it reaches..there’s a point…You see these little valves, these, like, sort of cosy little valves of recycling and Prius and like you know turns up somewhere, it starts reaching the point where you think ‘oh this is enough now. Stop voting. Stop pretending. Wake up. Be in reality now. Time to be in reality now’. Why vote? We know it’s not going to make any difference? We know that already?”

Paxman: “It does make a difference.”

Brand: “I have more impact at West Ham United, cheering them on, and they lost to City, unnecessarily, sadly.”

 “Now you’re being facetious.”

 “Facetiousness has as much value as seriousness, I think you’re making the mistake, of mistaking seriousness for solemnity”

Paxman: “You’re not going to solve world problems by facetiousness.”

Brand: “We’re not going to solve them with the current system. At least facetiousness is funny.”

Paxman: “Sometimes.”

Brand: “Yeah, sometimes, Jeremy. So listen. So let’s approach this optimistically. You’ve spent your whole career berating and haranguing politicians. And then when someone like me, a comedian, goes ‘they’re all worthless, what’s the point in engaging with any of them’, you sort of have a go at me because I’m not poor anymore. I’m sorry!”

Paxman: “I’m not having a go at you about that. I’m just asking why we should take you seriously when you’re so unspecific about what…?”

Brand: “You don’t have to take… Firstly, I don’t mind if you take me seriously. I’m here just to draw attention to a few ideas, I just want to have a little bit of a laugh. I’m saying there are people with alternative ideas that are far better qualified than I am, and far better qualified, more importantly, than the people that are currently doing that job. Because they’re not attempting to solve these problems. They’re not. They’re attempting to placate the population. Their measures that are currently being taken around climate change are indifferent, will not solve, will not solve the problem.”

Paxman: “You don’t think it’s possible that, as human beings, they’re simply overwhelmed by the scale of the problem?”

Brand: “Not really, well possibly. It might be that, but that’s all just semantics really, whether they’re overwhelmed by it or tacitly maintaining it because of habitual… I mean like, mate, this is what I noticed when I was in that Houses of Parliament. It’s decorated exactly the same as Eton, is decorated exactly the same as Oxford. So a certain type of people goes in there and thinks ‘this makes me nervous’ and then another type of people go in there and go ‘this is how it should be’. And I think that’s got to change now. We can no longer have erroneous, duplicitous systems held in place unless it’s for the serve…only systems that serve the planet and serve the population of the planet can be allowed to survive. Not ones that serve elites, be they political or corporate elites and this is what’s currently happening.”

Paxman: “You don’t really believe that.”

Brand: “I completely believe it. Don’t look at me all weary, like you’re at a fireside with your pipe and your beard.”

Paxman: “I mean Ed Miliband (inaudible)…”

 “Well he went to the same primary school as Boris, didn’t he?”

Paxman: “He did but he then went to a comprehensive school in north London.”

Brand: “Well that’s very good. That’s all well and good. But what I’m saying is, within the existing paradigm, the change is not dramatic enough, not radical enough. So you can well understand public disturbances and public dissatisfaction, when there are not genuine changes and genuine alternatives being offered. I say when there is a genuine alternative, a genuine option, then vote for that. But until then, pffft, don’t bother. Why pretend? Why be complicit in this ridiculous illusion?”

 “Because by the time somebody comes along you might think it worth voting for, it may be too late.”

Brand: “I don’t think so because the time is now, this movement is already occurring, it’s happening everywhere, we’re in a time where communication is instantaneous and there are communities all over the world. The Occupy movement made a difference in, even if, only in that, it introduced, to the popular public lexicon, the idea of the 1% versus the 99%. People for the first time in a generation are aware of massive, corporate and economic exploitation. These things are not nonsense. And these subjects are not being addressed. No one is doing anything about tax havens, no one is doing anything about their political affiliations and financial affiliations of the Conservative Party, so until people start addressing things that are actually real, why wouldn’t I be facetious, why would I take it seriously? Why would I encourage a constituency of young people that are absolutely indifferent to vote? Why would we? Aren’t you bored? Aren’t you more bored than anyone? Ain’t you been talking to them year after year, listening to their lies, their nonsense. Then it’s this one that gets in, then it’s that one gets in but the problem continues. Why are we going to continue to contribute to this facade?”

Paxman: “I’m surprised you can be facetious when you’re that angry about it.”

Brand: “Yeah, I am angry, I am angry. Because for me it’s real, because for me it’s not just some peripheral thing that I just turn up to once in a while to a church féte for. For me, this is what I come from. This is what I care about.”

Paxman: “Do you see any hope?”

Brand: “Remember that…yeah, totally, there’s gonna be a revolution. It’s totally going to happen. I ain’t got a flicker of doubt. This is the end. This is time to wake up.
I remember I seen you in that programme, where you look at your ancestors, and you saw the way your grandmother were out to brass herself or got fucked over by the aristocrats who ran her gaff. You cried because you knew that it was unfair and unjust. And that was what? A century ago? That’s happening to people now. I just come from a woman who’s been treated like that. I’ve just been talking to a woman, today, who’s being treated like that. So if we can engage that feeling, instead of some moment of lachrymose sentimentality trotted out on the TV for people to pore over emotional porn. If we can engage that feeling and change things, why wouldn’t we? Why is that naive? Why is that not my right because I’m an actor? I mean I’ve taken the right. I don’t need the right from you. I don’t need the right from anybody. I’m taking it.”

Read Brand’s New Statesman guest editorial here.

Read Brand’s 05/11/13 The Guardian response to the backlash brought on by his Paxman interview here.

The Harper Government released a terse statement at midnight EST that, effective immediately, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper was resigning. Reasons stated were an overwhelming sense of malaise and hopelessness at having destroyed any hope for Canada’s and indeed the global environment by having completely gutted the Navigable Waters Protection Act, destroyed the Global Environmental Monitoring System and Canada’s Experimental Lakes Area. Image

Not to mention destroying any credibility and traction Canada had on the world stage by withdrawing from both the Kyoto Accord and the UN Desertification Accord. Harpy is said, by insiders, to be helplessly hoping that Canadian history will redeem him as something less that the Mephistophelean caricature of a political opportunist and sell out to oil interests he has created for himself.

Henceforth the Government will be referred to as the Hapless Government. Stepping up to fill in as interim PM will be Bev Oda.


Queen Elizabeth II rocks! On Thursday July 14, 2011 she met The Prime Minister of Malaysia, Najib Razak, and his wife, Rosmah Mansor, during an audience at Buckingham Palace, London. She made her position on the current Malaysian political scene very plain, for all to see, by wearing bright yellow clothing during her audience with the Prime Minister.

Yellow is the colour of choice adopted by the popular anti-corruption Bersih (clean) campaign in Malaysia which last weekend attempted to hold a rally sanctioned by the Malaysian Agong (King). Queen Elizabeth is the head of The Commonwealth, of which Malaysia is a member. No doubt Najib will see the Queen’s sartorial shade selection as a slight and will seek to withdraw Malaysia from this august group of countries which help each other in times of need.

It is obvious that good Queen Bess is supporting her fellow royal the Malaysian King in his support of Bersih. After all royal families are becoming an endangered species.  It is also patently clear she is 100% behind the people of Malaysia and wanted to get into the P.M.’s face.

She made her point and made it loud and clear in canary yellow! As a citizen of another Commonwealth country i feel moved by QEII’s bold statement and will make sure i wear yellow when i visit my Malaysian family this summer. God save the Queen!

Saw this very interesting TEDtalk today and was immediately drawn by Lesley Hazelton’s eloquence and the depth of her research.

i must say when it comes to ice-cream i always prefer chocolate.  Vanilla is just too bland, good a la mode perhaps, but not much use for anything else.

Last week, while in Boston, i interviewed for several jobs while attending’s annual convention. It was very clear from who was getting interviews what the flavour of the month was: WASP.  i even asked one of the recruiters during the interview if they were considering NonNative English Speaker Teachers but he said that the client insisted on Native Speaker English Teachers and would not consider NNESTs.  i mentioned to him, that if his Middle Eastern client seriously needed a lot of English Language Teachers in a short time frame he might do well to try recruiting NNESTs.  i mentioned that in my experience (clément, Loh; NNESTs Front and Center in Educational Reform in the UAE; TESOL 2009, Denver) in the Middle East (and elsewhere) that good, qualified NNESTs were particularly suited to the rigors of working in this setting particularly if they are native Arabic speakers. They have insider knowledge of the culture and religion and are more readily able to deal with behaviour management issues as and when they arise.  This particular recruiter said he would take that under advisement and thanked me for my opinion.

i’m wondering what the ACLU would make of recruiters working to such specifications on US soil?

Yesterday i had an experience of what i can safely describe as reverse racism.  i responded to this ad in the Gulf News:

Walk – in Interviews
With fifty years of education experience, GEMS Education is committed to improving the quality of education worldwide. It is the leading kindergarten to grade 12 private education operator in the world. GEMS Education is also working with Governments around the world to improve the quality of education in Government schools.
GEMS Education is unique in that it provides a range of curricula at a variety of tuition fee levels. Some of these curricula are the International Baccalaureate, American, Indian and English. GEMS provides quality education to nearly 100, 000 students across 125 nationalities and employ over 97,000 education professionals, teachers and staff.
The Millennium School, Dubai provides high quality education to students from Kindergarten to Grade 12. It is a day boarding school, offering students a holistic education. Affiliated to the CBSE, the school is looking for qualified and experienced teachers for Geography, English, Mathematics, Social Studies, Physical Education with swimming (Lady only) and a Special Educator.
The school’s compensation package is designed to attract the best educators.
Walk in interviews for the above, will be held on Tuesday 30th. March 2010 between 9:30 am and 3:00 pm. The school is situated in Al Ghusais between Lulu Supermarket and NMC Speciality hospital.
All candidates should have a UAE Residence Visa and are requested to bring a current CV.
The Millennium School | Tel 04-2988567. GEMS EDUCATION Learn. Aspire. Be.

i got to the school early and spoke with a junior administrator and the security guard.  Neither had any idea that walk-in interviews were taking place.  The security guard escorted me inside and pointed out the front desk. An underling gave me a form to fill out.  i quickly filled it out, gave it back to her and went to sit down.  A few minutes later she called me over and mentioned that they were looking for teachers with Indian Curriculum experience; i mentioned that i’d worked in a number of countries with many different curriculums.

i was then ushered into the School Secretary’s office.  She told me they were looking for “qualified” teachers; i informed her that i had a bachelor of education, a masters of education and was working on a doctorate in education.  i am a qualified teacher and was looking forward to meeting with the interview panel.  i returned to the waiting area.

After another short interlude i was called into the Principal’s office.  He informed me that i was too qualified for the post(s) they had on offer.  He asked me how many years of experience i had, i told him over 30; he mentioned that he had that much too.

All in all, it was an interesting morning.  Turns out they were wanting toffee, mocha or chocolate, not plain old vanilla… i now have an inkling of what NNESTs feel like when they come up against Native Speaker bias.  A good English language teacher is a good teacher despite ethnic origin, race or variety of spoken English.

a short while ago some teenage friends of my teenage son Rauth came for a sleep-over.  They saw this poster on his wall…

they asked him if it was his mum and dad when they were younger…   i kid you not! but then again… maybe they had good reason….  Kim is definitely my Yoko Ono!

The powers that be have spent countless sums trying to answer this Where’s Waldo question since they lost track of their man in Afganistan in 2001.  It turns out the best place to hide may well be in plain view…  Who’d a thuk he would even advertise?  Was this where the formidable Bin Laden Contracting firm started?  In our humble little emirate of Ajman? It appears he’s even branched out to fine family dining and has no problem putting his name in lights!Quite the popular eatery, Osama is obviously a pretty sweet guy!  This next photo recently surfaced and allegedly shows Osama (or someone bearing an uncanny likeness to him) with his wife.

“They seek him here. They seek him there. Those Yankees seek him everywhere. Is he in heaven or is he in hell? That damn elusive Laden swell.”